Regenerating Historical Contexts, with an Approach to Enhancing Urban Livability

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Advanced Research in Art, Faculty of Visual Arts, College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

2 Master of Art Research, Department of Advanced Research in Art, , Faculty of Visual Arts, College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Abstract
Historical contexts are considered among the most valuable urban contexts, which over time, with the development of cities and the wear and tear of historical cores, have declined in terms of quality of life. This is while urban restoration has now reached urban regeneration in its evolutionary periods. On the other hand, among the existing approaches in urban planning, considering urban livability for regeneration has led to more interaction between the historical context and the city and its citizens. With this description, the main question and problem of this research is how to increase livability by regenerating historical contexts in a way that citizens experience a suitable quality of life in the contexts and do not intend to leave it. Therefore, the ultimate goal of this research is to identify factors that increase livability in regenerating historical contexts. To achieve the research objectives, this research has explored the subject based on the qualitative research method and specifically the descriptive-analytical method. Accordingly, the results of the research admit that livability has environmental and cultural factors that each group can save historical contexts from wear and tear and return them to urban life. Multiple factors such as improving security, improving urban services and facilities, proper access to public transportation, strengthening a sense of belonging to a place, and improving health conditions are among the reasons for increasing livability in historical contexts. These factors will not only increase the quality of life in these contexts but also protect them as a historical heritage.
 

Keywords


  • Adibi Saadinezhad, F. & Azimi, A. (2012). Explaning Security in Urban Enviroments Based on Phisical and Designe Parameters. Amayesh, 4(15), 81-105.

    • Azizi, M. M. & Behra, B. (2017). The Role of Flagship Developments in the Regeneration of Inner City Textures (The Case Study of Yazd City, Iran). Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture & Urban Planning, 22(4), 5-16.
    • Bahraini, S. H. (1997). Sharsazi va Tose’e-ye Paaydaar [Urban planning and sustainable development]. Rahyaft, 7(17), 28-39.
    • Carley, M. (2000). Urban Partnerships, Governance and the Regeneration of Britain’s Cities. International Planning Studies, 5(3), 273-297.
    • Habibi, D. (2014). A Study of the Factors Affecting on Fall of Joyfulness and Viability Sense in Historical and Timeworn Textures (Case Study: Sang Siah Neighborhood of Shiraz). Studies on Iranian Islamic City, (14), 75-80.
    • Habibi, S. M. & Maqsoodi, M. (2007). Urban Restoration: International Definitions, Theories, Experiences, Charters & Declarations, Urban Methods and Operations. 3rd ed. Tehran: University of Tehran.
    • Hanachi, P., Khademzade, M. H., Shayan, H. M., Kamelnia, H. & Mahdavinejad, J. (2007). Barresi-ye Tatbighi-ye Tajarob-e Maremmat-e Shahri Dar Iran Va Jahan Ba Neghah-e Vizhe Be Baft-e Tarikhi-ye Shahr-e Yazd [A Comparative Study of Urban Restoration Experiences in Iran and the World with a Special Look at the Historical Context of Yazd City]. Tehran: Sobhan-e Noor.
    • Hasanzadeh, M. & Soltanzadeh, H. (2016). Classifying Urban Revitalization Planning Strategies According to Quarters Sustainability. Studies on Iranian Islamic City, 6(23), 19-29.
    • Hataminejad, H., Pourahmad, A. & Nosrati Heshi, M. (2019). Future in Urban Worn-out Texture (Case Study: District 9 Area 1, Tehran Municipality). Geographical Data, 28(109), 37-55.
    • Heidary Sureshjani, R., Vafayi, A. & Doolatyaran, K. (2022). Assessment and Evaluation of the Project of Cultural-Social Regeneration of Public Spaces with the Approach of Improving Environmental Quality and Neighborhood Identity (The Case Study: Historical Walkways of Kashan City). Geographical Urban Planning Research, 10(3), 143-170.
    • Jafari Jebeli, H., Musakazemi, S. M., Hekmatnia, H. & Mokhtari, R. (2022). Investigating the Effects of Re-generated Urban Spaces on the Socio-Economic Performance of the Historical Context of Isfahan (Case study: Imam Ali Square). Geography and Environmental Planning, 33(1), 19-41.
    • Ghanon-e Hemayat Az Maremmat Va Ehya-ye Baft-Ha-Ye Tarikhi-Farhangi [Law on the Protection of the Restoration and Revival of Historical-Cultural Contexts]. (2010). Islamic Parliament Research Center of The Islamic Republic of IRAN. Retrieved 11/28/2023. From: https://rc.majlis.ir/fa/law/show/1199470.
    • Karimzadeh, A.; Shahriari, S. K. & Ardeshiri, M. (2017). An Explanation of Effective Cultural Policies on Culture Base Urban Regeneration (With Emphasis on the Experiences of Urban Renewal, Istanbul, Turkey). Hoviatshahr, 11(29), 95-106.
    • Khezerlou, A. & Abedini, A. (2022). A Comparative Study of Livability in New and Old Parts of the Cities (Case Study: Urmia city). Motaleate Shahri, 11(42), 35-48.
    • Landry, C. (2000). Urban Vitalitys: A New Source of Urban Competitiveness. Amsterdam: Prince Claus fund journal.
    • Mohebifar, A., Sobhiyah, M. H., Rafieian, M., Hasas yegane, Y. & Elahi, S. (2017). Governance of Distressed Areas Regeneration Program of Tehran with Network Approach. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, 14(53), 5-14.
    • Nasr, T. & Nikounam Nezami, H. (2022). Monitoring Regeneration Components to Improve the Quality of the Environment in Historical Neighborhoods Based on Expert’s Approach (Case Study: Historical Neighborhoods of Shiraz). The Culture of Islamic Architecture and Urbanism, 7(2), 163-180.
    • Nourian, F. & Ariana, A. (2012). Analyzing Judicial Support for Public Participation in Urban Regeneration Case Study of Imam Ali Square (Ateegh) in Isfahan. Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture & Urban Planning, 17(2), 15-28.
    • Pourahmad, A., Habibi, K. & Keshavarz, M. (2010). New Approaches of the Process of Conceptualizations of the Regeneration of the Urban Distressed Area. Studies on Iranian Islamic City, 1(1), 73-92.
    • Rabbiosi, S., Coletti, C. & Salone, C. (2020). Introduction to the Special Issue: Between Practices and Policies. Rethinking Urban Regeneration in Southern European Cities After the Crisis. Urban Research & Practice, 14(3), 217-222.
    • Safari Yazd, M., Ziyari, Y., Ziviar, P. & Behzad, A. (2022). Compilation of the Conceptual Framework of Livability Criteria in the Historical Context (Case Study: District 12 of Tehran). Quarterly of Geography (Regional Planing), 12(3), 561 -577.
    • Timmer, V. & Seymoar, N.K. (2005). Vancouver Working Group Discussion Paper, Vancouver.
    • Yu, J.H. & Lee, S.K. (2012). A Conflict-Risk Assessment Model for Urban Regeneration Projects Using Fuzzy FMEA. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, (16), 1093-1103.