An Investigation of the Morphogenesis of Iran’s Tobacco Movement through the Lens of Margaret Archer’s Theory

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student of Sociology, Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Law and Social Sciences, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran.

2 Master of Carpet Design, Tabriz Islamic Art University, Tabriz, Iran.

Abstract

Abstract
History shows that from ancient times to the present, the political system of Iran has remained authoritarian. The people have not been given a role in the administration of the country’s affairs in this style of government. According to investigations, the tobacco movement disrupted the political connection between the people and the government for the first time in Iran’s history. In this movement, the Iranian people began a major protest against a political problem to stand against the authoritarian government, and the relationship between the people and the government changed as a result. In this regard, the current study aims to provide a solution to this topic. What is the formation process of the tobacco movement through the lens of Margaret Archer’s integrated theory? The research is descriptive-analytical and qualitative. The data were collected using the library method from first-hand books and other valid scientific articles. The findings of this study revealed that before the tobacco concession was given, a dialectical interaction between political intellectuals and the government had begun. The interaction was launched after Iranians were defeated in the Russian war, and it peaked in the final decade of Naseruddin Shah’s reign. Intellectuals made strong criticisms of Naser al-Din Shah’s dictatorial government in a dialectical connection. Now, amid these criticisms and following the handover of tobacco concessions, the formation of this movement was first based on the self-awareness of domestic political forces such as intellectuals, and the publication of this self-awareness made other internal forces such as powerful economic and religious activists united. Upon such an alliance, ordinary activists influenced by these three powerful groups formed a formidable alliance in front of the court under the leadership of the intellectuals. The coalition of internal forces, along with the opposition of the Russian government to its interests, created pressure against the authoritarian government, and Nasir al-Din Shah was eventually compelled to announce that the tobacco monopoly contract was canceled.
 

Keywords


  • Abrahamian, Y. (2001). Iran between Two Revolutions (K. Firouzmand, H. Shamsavari, & M. Madiri Shanehchi, Trans.). (4th ed.). Tehran: Markaz. [in Persian]

    • Adamiyat, F. (1972). Andishe-y Taraghi va Hokumat-e Ghanon: Asr-e Sepahsalar [The idea of Progress and the Rule of Law: Sepahsalar’s Era]. Tehran: Kharazmi.
    • Alam, M. & Razavi Sosan, Z. (2012). Barresi-e Naghsh-e Zanan dar Jonbesh-e Tanbacco [Research on the Role of Women in the Tobacco Movement]. Woman Cultural Psychology (The Former Woman and Culture), 4(15), 71-78.
    • Amanat, A. (2006). Pivot of the Universe: Nasir al-Din Shah Qajar and the Iranian Monarchy (1831-1896) (H. Kamshad, Trans.). 3rd Ed. Tehran: Karnameh. [in Persian]
    • Archer, M. (1979). Social Origins of Educational Systems. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
    • Archer, M. (2002). Realism and the Problem of Agency. Journal of Critical Realisms, 5, 11-20.
    • Archer, M. (2010). Morphogenesis Versus Structuration: on Combining Structure and Action. The British journal of sociology, 33(4), 455-483.
    • Archer, M. & Morgan, J. (2020). Contributions to Realist Social Theory: An Interview with Margaret S. Archer. Journal of Critical Realism. 19(2), 179–200.
    • Azhand, Y. (1988). Ghiam-e Tonbacco [Tobacco Uprising]. Tehran: Amir Kabir.
    • Bagheri, S., & Nazarian, R. (2018). The Muslim Sociologist Achievement in Pure the Duality of Structure and Agency (Case Study of Three Theories). Tahghighat-e Bonyadin-e Olum-e Ensani [Fundamental Researches on Humanities], 4(1), 93-118.
    • Behnam, J. (2013). Iranian va Andishe-y Tajadod [Iranians and Modern Thought]. (4th ed. Tehran: Forouzan Roz.
    • Curzon, G. (2001). Persia and the Persian question (V. Mazandarani, Trans.). Tehran: Elmi O Farhangi Publications. [in Persian]
    • Fay, B. (2001). Contemporary Philosophy of Social Science: A Multicultural Approach (K. Dehimi, Trans.). Tehran: New Design. [in Persian]
    • Fouladi, D. (2015). Comparative Survey about the Role of Russia and England in two Contemporary Social Movement of Iran; Tanbacco and Mashroote. Political Science, 11(30), 35-52.
    • Ghazi Moradi, H. (2007). Estebdad Dar Iran [Dictatorship in Iran]. Tehran: Akhtaran.
    • Giddens, A. (2004). Global Perspectives (M. Jalaipour, Trans.). Tehran: Tarh-e No. [in Persian]
    • Golabi, F., Boudaghi, A., & Alipour, P. (2015). Analytical Review on Conflation of Agency and Structure in the thought of Pierre Bourdieu. Two Quarterly Journal of Contemporary Sociological Research Researches, 4(6), 117-143.
    • Harvey, D. L. (2002). Agency and Community: A critical Realist Paradigm. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 32(2), 163–194.
    • Hashemi, M & Golabi, F. (2022). The Iintegration Process in Margaret Archer’s Theory of Morphology. Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities, 28(112), 79-95.
    • Hossein Talaie, P. & Najafian Razavi, L. (2011). The Reasons for the Tendency Towards Translation of Historical Books in Qajar Era (with a glance into the main trends in translation in Iran). Pizhuhish nāmah-i intiqādī-i mutūn va barnāmah hā-yi ̒ulūm-i insāni [Critical Research Journal of Humanities Texts and Programs], 11(22), 1-14.
    • Karbalaie, H. (1982). Gharardad-e Regie 1890 AD ya Tarikh-e Enhesari-y Dokhaniat dar sal-e 1309 AH [Régie Contract of 1890 AD or the Date of Tobacco Monopoly in 1309 AH] . (2nd ed.). Tehran: Mubarezan.
    • Katouzian, M.H. (2000). State and Society in Iran: The Eclips of the Qajars and the Emergence of the Pahlavis (H. Afshar, Trans.). Tehran: Markaz. [in Persian]
    • Keddie, N. R. (1977). Religien and Rebellien in Iran (S. Ghaem Maghami, Trans.). Newyork: Franklin Publishing Company. [in Persian]
    • King, A. (2010). The odd couple: Margaret Archer, Anthony Giddens and British social theory. The British Journal of Sociology: shaping Sociology Over 60 Years, 61(1), 253-260.
    • Mazaheri, A. (2019). Magnifying the Role of Foreigners in the Tobacco Prohibition Movement and Its Impact on the Movement’s Historiography. Islamic Revolution Studies, 16(59), 133-154.
    • Mirsajadi, M. (2007). Mirzai Shirazi. Tehran: Iran Cultural Studies.
    • Morshedizad, A., Keshavarz Shokri, A., & Ahmadpour Turkmani, B. (2010). Mobilization and Political Action in the Tobacco Movement (1269-1270). Political Science, 6(2), 177-206.
    • Nategh, H. (1994). The Merchants in Trade with the Imperial Bank of Persia and Tobacco Régie. (2nd ed.). Tehran: Toos.
    • Parker, J. (2005). Structuration (A. Saeedipour, Trans.). Tehran: Ashtian. [in Persian]
    • Parker, J. (2007). Structuration (H. Ghazian, Trans.). Tehran: Ney. [in Persian]
    • Salimi, E. (2011). Mostasharan-e Khareji dar Iran (Az Aghaz Voroud ta Saltanat-e MohaMmad Shah Qajar) [Foreign Advisors in Iran (From the Beginning of Arrival to the Reign of Mohammad Shah Qajar)]. Foreign Relations History, 12(47), 96-77.
    • Shafie Sarvestani, M. (2018). The Role and Function of the Shrine of Ahmad bin Musa al-Akhmad Shahkrzeg (AS) in the Political and Social Transformations of Shiraz in the Movements of Tobacco and Constitutionalism. Religious Culture Approach, 1(1), 105-120.
    • Shamim, A. (2010). Iran in the Era of Ghajar Empire. 2nd Ed. Tehran: Behzad.
    • Shojaeezand, A. & Farhani, M. (2021). Tabacco Movement and the Emergence of “people” in the Field of Politics. Historical Sociology, 13(1), 195-218.
    • Soleimannezhad, F & et.al. (2023). Talayedar-e Modernism-e Siyasi dar Iran: Mirza Fathali Akhundzadeh [The Founder of Political Modernism in Iran: Mirza Fathali Akhundzadeh]. Tehran: Agar.
    • Tawhid Fam, M. & Hosseinian Amiri, M. (2018). Faraso-ye Konesh va Sakhtar [Beyond action and structure] Tehran: Gam-e No.
    • Teymuri, I. (1982).Tahrim-e Tonbacco: Avvalin Moghavemat-e Manfi dar Iran [Tobacco Embargo: The First Negative Resistance in Iran]. (3rd ed.). Tehran: Sepehr.