A comparative study of verbal cues in the Mihrab frontal part in the Mirabi (niche)rugs of Safavid and Qajar eras

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Art and Architecture, University of Sistan and bluchestan, Zahedan, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Art and Architecture, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran.

Abstract

Systematic reading of works of art helps to identify meaning and identity in the visual works. This is because the visual works of art, with their historical and social background, reflect the intellectual and cultural changes of the time; among these works, Mihrabi rugs can be noted. One of the most important points in these rugs, under the frontal part of Mihrab, is the representation of the verse of Noor. The verbal cues in this place can be regarded as a representation of the verse of Noor in the Safavid era, so it refers to an Islamic text; however, gradually, after the Safavid era, in the Qajar period, this place is assigned a specific human name and non-Islamic verbal signs. So the question is how can this change from non-subjectivity to subject and from an Islamic text to non-a Islamic one be explained? The answer to this question can be found by using a comparative-analytical method and matching the subjects and themes in the verbal text below the frontal part in the rugs during Qajar and Safavid periods;, the purpose of the present research was to explain this difference of the verbal cues in these rugs. By matching the rugs, it could be concluded that the artists, according to the common ideas in the Safavid period, tended to Islamic and Shiite principles, while in the Qajar era, due to the tendency to archeology, the influence of the West and the anthropocentric approach, rugs with different themes and symbols were created.

Keywords


  • Afrasiabpour, A. A. (2006). Mysticism in the Safavid period. Erfan va Adyan, 3(5), 13-37.

    • Atlihan, S. (2011). End Finishes of Topkapi Palace Museum Prayer Rug .In International Conference on Oriental Carpet, UK.
    • Azhand, Y. (2001). The Safavids. Tehran: Mowla.
    • Azhand, Y., Namvar Motlagh, B. & Erfanmanesh, S. (2021). Analysis of Meaning in the Niche Rug of the Metropolitan Museum by iconoloical method. Kimia-ye-Honar, 9(37), 71-85.
    • Bahramnejad, M. (2019). Introduction to recognizing the foundations and infrastructures of the political-national identity of the Safavid state. Tehran: Research Institute of Islamic History.
    • Bigdelou, S. (2001). Antiquity in the Contemporary History of Iran. Tehran: Markaz.
    • Bolkhari, H. (2005). Manifestation of light and color in Iranian-Islamic arts. Tehran: Soure-ye Mehr.
    • Bolkhari, H. (2019). Secrets of a flower. Tehran: Academy of Arts.
    • Burkel, J. & Burkel, D. (2010). Carpets of Iran: Weaving and techniques of nowadays (G. Zarrin, Trans.). Tehran: Gooya House of culture and Art.
    • Cody, A. (2002). Iran during the Qajar period and the rise of Reza Khan (M. Haghighatkhah, Trans.). Tehran: Ghoqnous.
    • Day, S. (1996). Great Carpets of the world. London: Thames and Hudson.
    • Eskandarpoor Khorami. P., Qaseminejad Rayeni, M. & Ahmadi, S. B. (2010). Pattern Codes of Prayer Rugs and Mihrab Carpets of Islamic Era in Iran. Goljaam. 6(16), 9-20.
    • Flor, W., Chelkovsky, P. & Ekhtiar, M. (2002). Qajar Paintings and Painters (Y. Azhand, Trans.). Tehran: Iil-e Shahsavan-e Baghdadi.
    • Frances, M. (1999). Some Wool Pile Persian-Design Niche Rugs. In International Conference on Oriental Carpet Danville, California.
    • Ghazali, A. H. (1985). Meshkat-Ol-Anwar (S. Ayeenevand, Trans.). Tehran: Amir Kabir.
    • Grabar, O. (1992). The mediation of ornament (Vol. 35, p. 38). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    • Hajizadeh, M. A., Khajeh-Ahmad Attari, A. & Aziminejad, M. (2016). Comparative study of design and role in Mihrabi carpets of Safavid and Qajar periods. Khorasan-e Bozorg, 7(25), 51-72.
    • Harrow, L. (1987). From the land of Sultan and Shah. London: Scorpion Publishing LTD.
    • Hassan, Z. M. (2009). Iranian art in Islamic times (M. I. Eghlidi, Trans.). Tehran: Seda-ye Mo’aser.
    • Hosouri, A. (2010). Fundamentals of Traditional Design in Iran. Tehran: Cheshmeh.
    • Island, M. (2000). Salting carpets. Ketab-e Mah-e Honar, (23&24), 66-73.
    • Jackson, P. & Lockhart, L. (2010). The Cambridge history of Iran: The Timurid and Safavid periods (Y. Azhand, Trans.). Tehran: Golshan.
    • Jafarian, R. (2009). Politics and culture of Safavid times. Tehran: Elm.
    • Kamandloo, H. (2009). A look at the Mihrabi carpets of Astan Quds Razavi Museum and a review of the carpets of Haft Shahr Eshgh. Negareh, 4(12), 18-39.
    • Keddie, R. N. (2002). Ghajar Iran and The Rise of Reza khan (M. Haqiqatkhah, Trans.). Tehran: Qoqnus.
    • Keshavarz Afshar, M. (2013). Relationship Between Image & Power in Late Qajar Period (from Naseri Era to the Constitutional Revolution of Iran) (Unpuplished Ph.D. thesis). Faculty of art, Tarbiat-e Modarres university, Iran.
    • Manouchehri, H. (2001). Jazawat wa al-mawaqit, a mystical and philosophical work by Mirdamad. Nashr-e Danesh-e Payeez, (101), 46-48.
    • Mirzaee. A., Shajari, M. & Pirbabaei, M. T. (2014). Epiphany of Asma’al Hosna in Mehrabi Carpets of Safavid Era. Goljaam, 10(25), 63-84.
    • Mohammadi Vakil, M. (2014). The Influences of Humanism in Qajar painting (Unpublished Ph.D. thesis). Faculty of Visual Arts, University of Tehran, Iran.
    • Pope, A. U. (2008). A survey of Persian art, from prehistoric times to the present (S. Parham, Ed.). Tehran: Elmi Farhangi.
    • Sabahi, T. (2014). Ghalin [Carpets]. V. 1. Tehran: Goya Culture and Art House.
    • Sakhai, E. (2008). Persian Rugs and Carpets the fabric life. London: Antique Cllectors Club.
    • Sefatgol, M. (2002). The structure and institution of religious thought in Safavid Iran. Tehran: Rasa Cultural Services.
    • Seuri, R. (2001). About the Safavid (R. A. Roohollahi, Trans.). Tehran: Markaz.
    • Shad, M. P. Gh. M. (1956). Farhang-e Anandraj (V. 6). Tehran: Khayyam.
    • Shayestehfar, M. (2005). Karbord-e Mafahim-e Mazhabi Dar Khatnegare-ha-ye Ghali-ye Safavi [Use of religious concepts in Safavid carpet calligraphy]. Islamic Art Studies, 2(3), 25-38.
    • Tabatabai, M. H. (1995). Tafsir-e Al-Mizan (M. B. Mousavi Hamedani, Trans.). Qom: Eslami.
    • Tamimdari, A. (1993). Mysticism and literature in the Safavid era (V. 1). Tehran: Hekmat.
    • Tanavoli, P. (1990). Iranian Pictorial Rugs. Tehran: Soroush.
    • Tanhaei, A. & Khazaei, R. (2009). En’ekas-e Mafahim-e Namaz Dara Ghaliche-ha-ye Mehrabi-ye Safavieh va Ghjariyeh [The reflection of the consepts of prayers in the Safavid and Ghajar rugs]. Islamic Art Studies, 6(11), 7-24.
    • Yarshater, E. (1997). History and Art of Carpet Weaving in Iran (Based on Iranica Encyclopedia) (R. La’li Khamseh, Trans.). Tehran: Niloufar.
    • Yasavoli Sani, J. (1995). Carpets and rugs of Iran. Tehran: Yasavali Cultural Center.
    • Younesi, M.. (1964). Mehr and Mihrab. Persian language and literature (Former Journal of the Faculty of Literature, University of Tabriz), 16(72), 423-450.
    • Zekrgoo, A. H. (2002). A fundamental reflection on comparative studies of art. Honar, (54), 163-173.