Journal of Art and Civilization of the Orient

Conceptual Interpretation of the Nishapur Third and Fourth Century AH Buff Pottery Motifs by Focusing on Zoroastrianism

https://doi.org/10.22034/jaco.2024.442225.1387
Volume 12, Issue 45
Autumn 2024
Pages 6-13
Journal of Art and Civilization of the Orient

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Hadis Mirzaee Fashami

M.A. in The Collection of Art Research and Handicrafts, History of Art in the Eslamic Countries College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, Iran.

Abstract
Pottery is one of the art products through which one can discern the social conditions, lifestyle, culture, and religion of the targeted society, as it closely connects with people’s lives. Based on the conducted excavations, third- and fourth-century AH potteries are among the most creative artifacts of the early Islamic period. These works were neither known in previous eras nor continued to be produced in later centuries. Various pottery samples have been discovered in Nishapur, giving rise to different theories about their motifs. However, the theories have yet to present valid and sufficient evidence. The research questions are: What themes inspired the motifs of the Nishapur third- and fourth-century AH buff potteries? Did pre-Islamic culture and ideologies influence them? After studying historical books, examining a wide range of the Nishapur pottery motifs, and analyzing them, an attempt was made to interpret the conceptual meanings of the pottery motifs. During the Samanid era, a revival of the sources on Zoroastrianism was witnessed. Observing the social and religious symbols of ancient times in the Nishapur buff potteries provides a suitable ground for exploration in this field. It seems that Zoroastrianism had the most significant influence on the pottery motifs. This research has a qualitative and strategic system. Further, it is basic research based on the objective. Given the research method, the study is historical research conducted inductively. The current paper was analyzed using a descriptive-analytical method. 

Keywords

Buff potteries
Nishapur
Zoroastrianism
Barsom
Haoma
•Askari Al-Mouti, H. (2017). Nishapur Painted Ware’s Content Readout with Focus on Apocalyptic Beliefs and Astronomical Predictions. Journal of Greater Khorasan, 7(25), 15-28. https://jgk.imamreza.ac.ir/article_137876.html?lang=fa
• Avesta. (2022). (Pourdavoud, E., & Darmesteter, J., Eds.). Negah.
• Azadbakht, M. & Tavousi, M. (2012). Continuity of motifs in Silver dishes of Sassanian era on Nishapur pottery designs in Samanid period. Negareh, 7(22), 52-77. https://negareh.shahed.ac.ir/article_48.html?lang=fa
• Bahar, M. T. (1976). Stylistics (Vol. 1). Sepehr.
• Bal’ami, A. (1974). Tarikh-e Bal’ami [History of Bal’ami] (Vol. 1). Tabesh.
• Changiz, S., & Rezaloo, R. (2012). Symbolic Evaluation of Animal motifs in Nishapur pottery (3th - 4th century AH). Fine Arts Journal - Visual Arts, 15(47), 33-44. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfava.2012.24375
• Chitsazian, A. H., & Roustaei, M. (2013). Assessment and analysis of symbolic drawing of animal motifs (paintings) onpotteries of 3rd and 4th century AH in Iran. Paykareh, 2(3), 7-18. https://doi.org/10.22055/pyk.2013.12942
• Ettinghausen, R., Serratto, U. & Bombaci, A. (2015). Honar-e Samani va honar-e Ghaznavi [Samanid Art and Ghaznavid Art] (Y. Azhand, Trans.). Mola. [in persian] 
• Flaterry, D. S. & Schwarz, M. (1989). Haoma & Harmaline: The botanical identity of the indo-iranian sacred hallucinogen “Soma” & it’s legacy in religion, language & Middle astern folklore. University of California Press. https://books.google.com/books/about/Haoma_and_Harmaline.html?id=INtzYGQOlFoC
• Ghasemian, K. (2012). Giyah-e Hoama yadegari az farhang-e Iran zamin az dortarin zaman ta be emroz [Haoma: A Legacy of Iranian Culture from Ancient Times to the Present]. Forouhar.
• Gonabadi, M. P. (1974). Tarikh-e Bal’ami [History of Bal’ami] (Vol. 1). Tehran: Tabesh.
• Grube, E. J. (2005). Islamic Pottery (Vol. 7) (F. Jaieri, Trans.). Karang. [in persian]
• Hamby, L., Duvillar, M., & Widengren, G. (2010). Tarikh-e Honar-e Iran: Manavi na Zartoshti [Iranian Art History: Manichaeism & Zoroastrianism] (Vol 3) (Y. Azhend, Trans.). Moli. [in persian]
• Hampartian, M., & Khazaei, M. (2005). Noghosh-e Ensani bar sofalineha-ye Neyshabour [Human motifs on Neyshabour potteries]. Islamic Art Studies, 2(3), 39–60.    
• Javadi, S., & Nikoei, A. (2017). Studying the Goddess Anahita in Ancient Iran and Armenia. Journal of Art and Civilization of the Orient, 5(17), 51-60. https://www.jaco-sj.com/article_59522.html?lang=fa
• Ma’soumi, Gh. (2014). Encyclopedia of Mythology Ancient & religions of the world (Vol. 3). Soore Mehr.
• Mazdapour, K., & Latifpour, S. (2011). Haoma plant and its role in indo-Iranian liturgies and myths. Journal of Studies in Lyrical Language and Literature, 3(10), 203-226. https://journals.iau.ir/article_522075.html
• Mirzaee, B., & Moradkhani, A. (2019). Reflection of Mithraism on Designs of NeyshaPur Potteries in Samanid Era. Rahpooye Honar-Ha-Ye Tajassomi, 2(1), 47-57. https://doi.org/10.22034/ra.2019.241844
• Naji, M (2008). Samanid and Ghaznavid Era. Qoqnoos.
• Pancaroglu, O. (2013). Feasts of Nishapur: Cultural Resonances of Tenth-Century Ceramic Production in Khurasan. In M. McWilliams (Ed.), Harmony: The Norma Jean Calderwood Collection of Islamic Art (pp. 11). Harvard Art Museums.
• Sibuye, N. (2020). Iconographical Criticism of the Ship Seated Bowl from the Samanid Nishabur pottery. Journal of Visual and Applied Arts, 13(27), 89-108. https://doi.org/10.30480/vaa.2020.2490.1387
• Tafazzoli, A. (1975). Menog-i Khrad. Farhang Foundation.
Vermaseren, M. (2004). Mithras (B. Naderzadeh, Trans.). Cheshmeh. [in persian] (original work published 1960)
• Wilkinson, Ch. K. (1897). Nishapur: Pottery of early Islamic period. The Metropolitian Museum of Art. https://books.google.com/books/about/Nishapur_Pottery_of_the_Early_Islamic_Pe.html?id=gZSoHPo_PBMC

Home

Submit Manuscript

Contact Us