Studying the Poems of Omar Khayyam Based on Hypertextuality in Prominent Calligraphy Works (Case Study: Quatrain or Rubái No. 103)

Volume 12, Issue 44
Summer 2024
Pages 54-67

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student, Department Of Islamic Arts, Faculty of Islamic Crafts, Tabriz Islamic Art Univercity, Tabriz, Iran.

2 Associate Professor, Department of Theoretical Studies of Visual Arts, Faculty of Visual Arts, Tabriz Islamic Art University, Tabriz, Iran.

Abstract
Among numerous calligraphy scripts, Nastaliq is inseparably associated with Iranian culture and literature, as it represents part of Iranian culture and art. The consonance of Nastaliq’s appearance with the spirit of Persian poetry provided the basis for more interaction of this writing style with Persian literature to give a balanced structure to the rhythmic poems. This script has various forms that are mostly applied in poetry, calligraphy, and Chalipa as kind of it.  The quatrains No. 103 of Khayyam’s poem with a high degree of repetition by calligraphers in the form of Chalipa have been addressed in this research. To comprehend the concepts behind these artworks, it is required to study the textual relationships between them and carry out the relevant transtextual studies. The transtextuality approach of Gerard Genette targets all existing relationships between texts, among which hypertextuality is more adaptable to artistic texts. This term is defined as the influence of one text on another. Therefore, this research aims to systematically study the quatrains 103 of Khayyam’s poems, to address the textual relationships among them. The main research question here is to know how the hypertextuality of Genette can be identified in the mentioned works. The research method was based on a descriptive-analytical approach, and the data were collected relying on documented resources and observation by using qualitative analysis. According to the research findings, the reference to the hypotext in these works is significant, and the function of hypertexts is often serious, so the process changes very slowly.

Keywords

• Abrams, M.H. & Harpham, G. (1993). Glossary of literartyterm. Cengage Learning.
• Adli, N., Dehghan, A. & Amani Astemal, R. (2018). Mazmonsazi ba estelahat-e khoshnevisi dar masnavi-ye Selsele-Ye Al-Zahab‏ (Haft Awrang of Jami) ([Thematic creation with calligraphic terms in the Jami’s Selsele-Ye Al-Zahab Masnavi‏ (Haft Awrang of Jami)]. Baharestan-e Honar, 16(45), 207-232. https://journals.iau.ir/article_688753.html?lang=en
• Allen, G. (2001). Intertextuality (P. Yazdanjo, Trans.). Markaz. [in persian] (Original work published 2000)
• Amirkhani, Gh. (1982). Rasmol khat-e Amirkhani [Calligraphy practices by Amirkhani].Society of Iranian Calligraphists.
• Bazi, S. & Farrokhfar, F. (2020). Visual Representative of Verbal Creation as a Figure of Speech in Nasta’liq Calligraphy with an Emphasis on Artworks of Calligrapher Gholamhossein • Amirkhani. New Literary Studies, 53(2), 49-67. https://doi.org/10.22067/jls.v53i2.86781
• Dawachi, M. (2021). The Role of Letters and Calligraphy in Public Art (Comparison of Three Examples of Iranian Public Letter-Based Art with Three Non-Iranian Examples Over the Decade). Journal of Art and Civilization of the Orient, 9(32), 17-28. https://doi.org/10.22034/jaco.2021.289567.1202
• Fazaeli, H. (1984). Atlas-e Khat [Encyclopedia of Calligraphy]. Mashal.
• Frow, J. (2005). Genre. Rutledge. https://books.google.com/books?id=15-QBAAAQBAJ&pg=PR5&source=gbs_selected_pages&cad=1#v=onepage&q&f=false
• Ghaemi Bojgan, M. S. (2014). Naghsh-e noghte dar khoshnevisi va amalkard-e an bar tarahi-ye horof-e Farsi [The role of [Inserting] dot in calligraphy and its function in the design of Persian letters] (Unpublished master’s thesis in art research). Faculty of Arts, Shahed University, Ministry of Science Research and Technology, Tehran, Iran.
• Ghelichkhani, H. (2013). Daramadi bar khoshnevisi-ye Irani [An Introduction to Persian Calligraphy]. Farhang Moaser.
• Golestan, A. & Attarzadeh, A. (2019). A Form Analysis of the Muhammad Ibrahim Tehrani’s Calligraphic Inscriptions in the Shrine of Imamzade Hamze. The History of Islamic Culture and Civilization, 9(33), 89-116.
• Hassanzadeh Rostami, A. & Jafarizadeh, A. (2017). Erfan, she’er va khoshnewisi: se bo’d-e yek ma’na [Mysticism, poetry and calligraphy, three dimensions of a single meaning]. National Conference on Iranian Islamic Art Effects in Culture, Science and Documentation, Rasht.
• Highsmith, C. (2015). Inside Paragraphs: Typographic Fundamentals (F. Aryan-Nejad, Trans.). Meshki. [in persian] (Orgininal work published 2012)
• Kangarani, M. (2010). The process of hypertextuality in painting. Journal of Visual and Applied Arts, 2(4), 19-34.
• Mahmoodi, A. (2017). Estelahat-e khoshnevisi dar she’er-e Sa’adi [Calligraphy terminology in Saadi’s poetry]. Sa’adishenasi, (5), 104-111.
• Mahoozi, M. (2006). An Evaluation of khayyam’s notion on the Basis of the corpus of his Authentic Quatrains. The Journal of Epic Literature, 1(1), 15-53. https://sanad.iau.ir/fa/Article/1115023?FullText=FullText
• Matin, P. (2012). Khoshnevisi (az seri ,maghalat-e Iranica) [Calligraphy (from the series of Iranica articles)]. Amirkabir.
• Momeni, H., Shiri, F. & Zeighmi, M. (2017). Bazkhani tasavof dar honarha-ye Irani Islami az manzar-e tahlil-e gofteman (ba neghahi be honar-e khoshnevisi) [Representing Sufism in Islamic -Iranian Arts from the Perspective of Discourse Analysis (with a Look at the Art of Calligraphy and Poetry)]. National Conference on Iranian Islamic Art Effects in Culture, Science and Documentation, Tehran.
• Namvar Motalagh, B.  (2015). Daramadi bar beynamatniyat, nazariyeha va karbordha [Introduction to Intertextuality, Theories and Applications]. Sokhan.
• Namvar Motalagh, B. (2015). Beynamatniyat: sakhtargaraei ta pasamodernism [Intertextuality: from Post-structuralism to Post-modernism]. Sokhan.
• Namvar Motlagh, B. (2004). Matha-ye darajeh dovoom [Secondary texts]. Kherad Nameh, Cultural Supplement of Andisheh Magazine, Hamshahri Newspaper, (59), 10 & 11.
• Namvar Motlagh, B. (2011). Hypotextual Genrologie. Literary Research, 9 (38), 139-152. http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.17352932.1391.9.38.7.7
• Namvar Motlagh, B. (2020). From Trans-Narrative to Hyper-Narrative; A Study of Second-Degree Narratives. Pazhouhesh Nameh-e Farhangestan-e Honar, 5(2), 105-119. http://pazhouheshnameh.ir/article-1-89-fa.html
• Namvar Motlagh, B. (2021). Trans-Narration, Hypertextual Relationships of Narratives. Sokhan.
• Rashvand, I. (2013). Khoshnevisi [Calligraphy]. Sherkat-e Chapo Nashr-e Ketabhay-e darsi Iran [Iran Textbook Print & Publishing Company).
• Sadeghi, H. (2018). Rubaiy’at -e Khayyam. Gooya House of Art and Culture.
• Seki, Y. (2007). Asar-e khoshnevisi dar do margha’-e Soltan Yaghoub (Yadegari az asr-e Qara Qoyunluha va Aq Qoyunluha, mahfoz dar moze-ye Topkapi Sarai-e Istanbul [Calligraphic works in two Muraqqa works of Sultan Yaghoob (A relic of the era of Qara Qoyunluha and Aq Qoyunluha, preserved in Topkapo Sarai Museum in Istanbul]. Nameh-ye Baharestan, (11 & 12), 75-172.
• Shafighi, N. (2020). Study Types of Hypotext [Hypertextyality] in Iran`s Graffiti. Negareh Journal, 15(56), 139-153. https://doi.org/10.22070/negareh.2020.3111  
• Zaredar, M. M. (2015) Bagh-e Tarab: albomi az asar-e khoshnevisi Irani va negarehay-e hendi [Tarab garden: an album of Iranian calligraphy works and Indian paintings]. Ravagh-e honar.