A comparative Study Between the Faces and Clothing Items in Manichaean Paintings and Those of Early Islam

Volume 11, Issue 40
Summer 2023
Pages 19-34

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of Painting, Faculty of Arts, AlZahra University, Tehran.

2 Master of Painting, Faculty of Art, AlZahra University, Tehran , Iran.

Abstract
In Manichaean paintings, the presence and role of man are very prominent. Manichaeans had special methods and principles for designing human faces; by borrowing from the faces of different lands and nations and integrating them with the imagination of his mind, Manichaean artists have tried to create different faces with different execution methods. Like Manichaean paintings, humans have an active presence in the paintings of early Islam, and the painters continued Manichaean’s way and method of drawing human portraits. Although there have been some changes in the portraiture of early Islam, the overall shape and features of the facial parts and, in some cases, the clothing of the figures, are the same as in the Manichean art style. This study tries to answer these questions: Manichean portraiture is influenced by the faces of which lands and nations, and what are its characteristics? What was the reason for drawing identical faces in Manichaean paintings? What features of the face and clothing of Manichaean paintings can be seen in the paintings of early Islam? The purpose of this study is to explore the characteristics of the face and clothing in Manichaean paintings and examine their similarities and differences with those of the Abbasid (Baghdad School), Samani, Ghaznavid, and Seljuk eras. The present study was done using a library-documentary study with a descriptive-analytical approach and a comparative approach. This study is of great importance because it raises new issues and makes new claims in terms of the stylistics of the art of painting in finding the origin of the art of painting and portraiture in early Islam (the Abbasid (Baghdad School), Samani, Ghaznavid, and Seljuq eras). Hence, this study aims to prove this hypothesis that the painting of early Islam was strongly and significantly influenced by the Manichaean style of portraiture. The results indicated that characteristics such as drawing identical faces, three-side angulation and oval shape of the face, lack of shading and simulating volume, small and elongated eyes, linear and slightly curved eyebrows, a small mouth and lips, a straight or arched nose, and hair arranged on the forehead are among the main characteristics of Manichaean portraiture, which were also used in the portraiture of early Islamic eras.

Keywords

  • Abbaszade, H., Khamseh, H. & Mortezaei, M. (2020). Noyaftehaye Naqashi Divary qaznavi dar Masjed-e Shahre Tarikhi-e Sang Bast. Bastan Shenasi Iran, 9 (1), 111- 125.
  • Akashe, S. (2001). Islamic Miniature (Gh. Tahami, Trans.). Tehran: Sazman Tablighat Eslami Hoze Honari.
  • Akhondi, Sh. (2010). An Investigation into Transformation of Portraiture in traditional Iranian Miniature, (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Faculty of Art & Architecture, Tarbiat Modarres University, Tehran, Iran.
  • Arnold, T. & Pope, A. (2014). Survey of Persian Art (Y. Azhand, Trans.). Tehran: Mola.
  • Ataie, M., Mosaviye Haji, R. & Koulabadi, R. (2012). Slip-painted Pottery (Types, Widespread, Dating). Negareh, 7 (23), 70- 87.
  • Azhand, Y. (2020). A Research on Persian Painting and Miniature Vol. 1. Tehran: Samt.
  • Bombaci, A., Ettinghausen, R. & Schrato, U. (2015). Honar samani va ghaznavi (Y. Azhand, Trans.). Tehran: Mola.[in Persian]
  • Cattelli, M. & Hambis, L. (1997). Honar-e Saljuqi va Qaznavi (Y. Azhand, Trans.). Tehran: Mola.
  • Chen, X. (2019). The Spread of Manichaeism among the Uyghur Khanate based on Turfan and Chinese Texts, (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran.
  • Esmailpour, A. (2021). Ostoore Afarinesh dar kish Mani. Tehran: Cheshmeh.
  • Ettinghausen, R. & Grabar, O. (2001). Islamic Art and Architecture (Y. Azhand, Trans.). Tehran: Samt. [in Persian]
  • Gulácsi, Z. (2016). Mani’s Pictures: the didactic images of the Manichaeans from Sasanian Mesopotamia to Uygur Central Asia and Tang-Ming China. Boston: Brill.
  • Hoffman, E. (2008). Between East and West: The Wall Painting of Samarra and Abbasid Princely Culture, Publisher: Brill.
  • Hokmabadi, A. S., Khazaee, M. & Ahmadpanah, S. A. (2015). Barresi noqoshe parchehaye samani, Quarterly bulletin of Greater Khorasan, 6 (20), 57- 74.
  • Kiani, M. Y. (1996). Iranian Pottery: A General Survey Based on the Prime Ministry of Iran’s Collections. Tehran: Nokhostvaziri.
  • Kuhnel, E. (2009). Islamic Art (Y. Azhand, Trans.). Tehran: Mola.
  • Pakbaz, R. (2021). Naqqash-i Iran az Dirbaz ta Emruz. Tehran: Zarrin- o Simin.
  • Panjehbashi, E. & Mohammadjani Divkolaei, Z. (2022). Analytical Study of the Meaning of Symbolic Elements with Emphasis on the Halo of Light in Manichaean Painting, Rahpooyeh Art, 5 (2), 17- 28.
  • Schlumberger, D. (1952). Le palais ghaznevide de Lashkari Bazar, Librairie Orientaliste Paul Geuthner, (29), 251- 270.
  • Shabani, A. & Mahmoudi, F. (2014). Comparative Atudy of Turfan and Golshah’s paintings in Seljuk Era. Motaleate-e Tatbighi-e Honar, 5 (10), 83-96.
  • Tajvidi, A. (2008). Review of the Iranian Painting Art from the beginning to the 10th century A.H. Tehran: Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance.
  • Klimkeit, H.J. (2017). Manichaean Art (A. Esmailpour, Trans.). Tehran: Hirmand.[in Persian]
  • Watson, O. (2004). Ceramics from Islamic lands. London: Thames & Hudson, in association with the al-Sabah Collection, Dar al-Athar al- Islamiyyah, Kuwait National Museum.
  • Toosheh Asl, M. (2020). Phenomenology of Iranian Painting Art in the Sassanid Period and its Influence in the Later Period (relying on the role of Mani), Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Mohaghegh Ardabili University, Ardabil, Iran.